I don’t believe drastic changes or cutting staff (as the board did in 2010) are necessary to achieve long-term savings—we can even improve property conditions at the same time we are getting better value for assessments by just following the same good practice guidelines other HOAs do. Karim and I are dedicated to respectful and courteous debate based on transparent facts and evidence. Unlike some incumbents, who gave a wink and a nod to personal attacks in ballots and at meetings against those who disagreed with them.
What we’re not big fans of is “harmony“ based on holding the shortest possible meetings with no regard for priorities, funding sources, cost controls, and opposing viewpoints. Or simply trading votes for support on pet projects. In 2024, over 95% of board votes were unanimous; according to minutes, there was just one opposing vote during the entire year!
That’s not how it’s supposed to work, and not how other HOAs operate. As opposed to genuine teamwork and real collaboration, it's more like a kid's game of Follow the Leader. Owners spoke loud and clear at this year's Candidate's Coffee; they want a board who can focus on wise savings and meaningful problem solving rather than business-as-usual politics.